Many employers don’t want to have to take the monetary fall if someone has a literal fall. If you have been the accident of a bunk worker’s compensation case, you know what it’s like to get the raw end of a deal. Many Americans have had to deal with this in the wake of trying to pass a drug test either before or after an accident.
Take this summary from Risk & Insurance magazine about an employee and really read carefully what the employer tried to have implied about this worker:
“A water truck operator was injured when he stuck his foot through an open hatch on the front of a machine while working on a road building job. Rotating blades inside the machine caught his foot, severing his ankle until his foot was nearly amputated. He was taken to a hospital for treatment. He told hospital staff he did not use “street drugs.” He received a urine drug screen and tested positive for marijuana at a level in excess of the legal threshold for intoxication due to marijuana, excluding the possibility of passive inhalation. The operator admitted to smoking marijuana two weeks before the accident. He sought temporary total disability benefits and medical expenses. The Louisiana Court of Appeal held that the operator was entitled to benefits.
The employer argued that the operator should have been presumed to be intoxicated at the time of the accident due to the failed drug screen. The court explained that the law requires positive drug test to be verified or confirmed by gas chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy, or another comparably reliable analytical method in order for the intoxication defense to apply. The drug test here was unconfirmed and unverified.”
You have rights. But before you get into the kind of litigation that can literally go on for years, why not just be able to pass a drug test no matter what? That’s what we offer at PassADrugTest.com — peace of mind for working Americans!
The employer did not provide other reliable evidence to show that the operator was intoxicated at the time of the accident. No one saw him smoke marijuana or act strangely on the day of the accident. Although he “exhibited extremely poor judgment” in kicking through the open hatch of the machine, the court said his decision was not proof that he was intoxicated.